Chapter 8 - Timber Casualty Loss Audit Techniques Guide
Publication Date: April 2011
NOTE: This guide is current through the publication date. Since changes may have occurred after the publication date that would affect the accuracy of this document, no guarantees are made concerning the technical accuracy after the publication date.
8. References
A. Initial IDR
For all years under examination for which a timber casualty loss was claimed please provide the following:
-
The timber depletion schedule for the SIP identified as the property sustaining the loss.
-
Appraisals of the single identifiable property (SIP) both before and after the casualty event to substantiate the diminution in fair market value of the affected SIP. This should include all data and/or assumptions, projections, limiting conditions used in computations to substantiate the claimed loss.
-
The "before" appraisal should include timber inventory beginning balances for all timber sub-accounts in the affected block (SIP) just prior to the casualty. (i.e., saw timber, pulpwood, reproduction, and premerchantable.)
-
The "after" appraisal should include timber inventory beginning balances for all timber in the affected block (SIP) just after the casualty.
-
Maps showing location of the SIP and the area damaged by the casualty event.
-
The original field data taken immediately after the casualty event and steps taken to mitigate the loss.
-
Harvest data for damaged timber that was salvaged. (include volumes and products by species.)
|
Board Foot |
A unit of measurement represented by a board, which is typically unfinished and unsurfaced, 1 foot long, 1 foot wide and 1 inch thick. In practice, the working unit is 1,000 board feet, which is normally abbreviated MBF. |
|
Crown |
The upper part of a tree, including branches, foliage, etc. |
|
Cruise |
To survey forest lands for the purpose of locating and estimating volumes and grades of standing timber. |
|
Cull |
Tree or log that is unmerchantable because of defects. |
|
Cunit |
Unit of volume consisting of 100 cubic feet. Unit of measure for stacked pulpwood that equals 100 cubic feet of solid wood (does not include bark or air volume.) |
|
Depletion Block
|
Each timber account contains a block of timber. A block can consist of all timber that would logically go to a single point of manufacture, or it may consist of a logging unit that would logically be cut in a single operation. A block also can be defined by geographic or political boundaries or by logical management areas. Timber that is acquired in smaller units, such as a tract, may be aggregated into the larger depletion block, if the taxpayer elects. A depletion block is an accounting pool and cannot be changed without the approval of the commissioner using a Form 3115. |
|
Girdle |
To encircle the stem of a living tree with cuts with the intention of killing the tree. The cuts are made to sever the bark and cambium. The tree dies by preventing the passage of nutrients. Toxic materials may be injected into the tree through the cut also. |
|
MBF |
An abbreviation for 1,000 board feet, which is the working unit for measuring volumes of wood. |
|
Pulpwood |
Wood that is cut primarily to make wood pulp, which may be manufactured into the following: paper, paperboard, etc. |
|
Reforestation |
Restocking an area with forest trees. |
|
Reproduction |
Young trees with little to no commercial utilization or significant measurable volume per tree. Generally 15 years of age or less. |
|
Saw timber |
Trees from which saw logs are cut. Saw timber stands generally are stands where sawtimber-sized trees are the most important component. |
|
Scribner Rule |
Diagram log rule, one of the oldest in existence, that assumes 1-inch boards, a 1/4-inch kerf, makes a liberal allowance for slab, and disregards taper. Used in many parts of the United States, especially in the West. |
|
Severance Tax |
A state excise tax. It is levied on timber cut. |
|
SIP |
Single Identification Property. Term used in IRC § 165 for determining the property affected by casualty |
|
Stand |
An aggregation of trees occupying a specific area of land and sufficiently uniform in species composition, age, density, and other conditions so as to be easily distinguishable from the forest or other growth on adjoining areas. |
|
Stumpage |
Standing timber |
|
Timber |
For federal tax purposes, it is the wood in standing trees that is available and suitable for exploitation and use by the forest industries. |
C. Reference Material
IRC 165 Regulations:
FINAL-REG, 2003FED 10,004, §1.165-7., Casualty losses.–
Casualty losses.–(a) In general.–(1) Allowance of deduction.–Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b)(4) and (c) of this section, any loss arising from fire, storm, shipwreck, or other casualty is allowable as a deduction under section 165(a) for the taxable year in which the loss is sustained. However, see §1.165-6, relating to farming losses, and §1.165-11, relating to an election by a taxpayer to deduct disaster losses in the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the disaster occurred. The manner of determining the amount of a casualty loss allowable as a deduction in computing taxable income under section 63 is the same whether the loss has been incurred in a trade or business or in any transaction entered into for profit, or whether it has been a loss of property not connected with a trade or business and not incurred in any transaction entered into for profit. The amount of a casualty loss shall be determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. For other rules relating to the treatment of deductible casualty losses, see §1.1231-1, relating to the involuntary conversion of property.
(2) Method of valuation.–(i) In determining the amount of loss deductible under this section, the fair market value of the property immediately before and immediately after the casualty shall generally be ascertained by competent appraisal. This appraisal must recognize the effects of any general market decline affecting undamaged as well as damaged property which may occur simultaneously with the casualty, in order that any deduction under this section shall be limited to the actual loss resulting from damage to the property.
(ii) The cost of repairs to the property damaged is acceptable as evidence of the loss of value if the taxpayer shows that (a ) the repairs are necessary to restore the property to its condition immediately before the casualty, (b ) the amount spent for such repairs is not excessive, (c ) the repairs do not care for more than the damage suffered, and (d ) the value of the property after the repairs does not as a result of the repairs exceed the value of the property immediately before the casualty.
(3) Damage to automobiles.–An automobile owned by the taxpayer, whether used for business purposes or maintained for recreation or pleasure, may be the subject of a casualty loss, including those losses specifically referred to in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph. In addition, a casualty loss occurs when an automobile owned by the taxpayer is damaged and when:
(i) The damage results from the faulty driving of the taxpayer or other person operating the automobile but is not due to the willful act or willful negligence of the taxpayer or of one acting in his behalf, or
(ii) The damage results from the faulty driving of the operator of the vehicle with which the automobile of the taxpayer collides.
(4) Application to inventories.–This section does not apply to a casualty loss reflected in the inventories of the taxpayer. For provisions relating to inventories, see section 471 and the regulations there under.
(5) Property converted from personal use.–In the case of property which originally was not used in the trade or business or for income-producing purposes and which is thereafter converted to either of such uses, the fair market value of the property on the date of conversion, if less than the adjusted basis of the property at such time, shall be used, after making proper adjustments in respect of basis, as the basis for determining the amount of loss under paragraph (b)(1) of this section. See paragraph (b) of §1.165-9, and §1.167(g)-1.
(6) Theft losses.–A loss which arises from theft is not considered a casualty loss for purposes of this section. See §1.165-8, relating to theft losses.
(b) Amount deductible.–(1) General rule. – In the case of any casualty loss whether or not incurred in a trade or business or in any transaction entered into for profit, the amount of loss to be taken into account for purposes of section 165(a) shall be the lesser of either–
(i) The amount which is equal to the fair market value of the property immediately before the casualty reduced by the fair market value of the property immediately after the casualty; or
(ii) The amount of the adjusted basis prescribed in §1.1011-1 for determining the loss from the sale or other disposition of the property involved. However, if the property used in a trade or business or held for the production of income is totally destroyed by casualty, and if the fair market value of such property immediately before the casualty is less than the adjusted basis of such property, the amount of the adjusted basis of such property shall be treated as the amount of the loss for purposes of section 165(a).
(2) Aggregation of property for computing loss.–(i) A loss incurred in a trade or business or in any transaction entered into for profit shall be determined under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph by reference to the single, identifiable property damaged or destroyed. Thus, for example, in determining the fair market value of the property before and after the casualty in a case where damage by casualty has occurred to a building and ornamental or fruit trees used in a trade or business, the decrease in value shall be measured by taking the building and trees into account separately, and not together as an integral part of the realty, and separate losses shall be determined for such building and trees.
(ii) In determining a casualty loss involving real property and improvements thereon not used in a trade or business or in any transaction entered into for profit, the improvements (such as buildings and ornamental trees and shrubbery) to the property damaged or destroyed shall be considered an integral part of the property, for purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, and no separate basis need by apportioned to such improvements.
(3) Examples.–The application of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example (1). In 1956 B purchases for $3,600 an automobile which he uses for
nonbusiness purposes. In 1959 the automobile is damaged in an accidental collision
with another automobile. The fair market value of B's automobile is $2,000
immediately before the collision and $1,500 immediately after the collision.
B receives insurance proceeds of $300 to cover the loss. The amount of the
deduction allowable under section 165(a) for the taxable year 1959 is $200,
computed as follows:
Value of automobile immediately before casualty is $2,000, less the value of automobile immediately after casualty of 1,500 equals the value of property actually destroyed, 500.
Loss to be taken into account for purposes of section 165(a):
Lesser amount of property actually destroyed ($500) or adjusted basis of property ($3,600). $500 less insurance received equals the deduction allowable of 200.
Example (2). In 1958 A purchases land containing an office building for the lump sum of $90,000. The purchase price is allocated between the land ($18,000) and the building ($72,000) for purposes of determining basis. After the purchase A planted trees and ornamental shrubs on the grounds surrounding the building. In 1961 the land, building, trees, and shrubs are damaged by hurricane. At the time of the casualty the adjusted basis of the land is $18,000 and the adjusted basis of the building is $66,000. At that time the trees and shrubs have an adjusted basis of $1,200. The fair market value of the land and building immediately before the casualty is $18,000 and $70,000, respectively, and immediately after the casualty is $18,000 and $52,000, respectively. The fair market value of the trees and shrubs immediately before the casualty is $2,000 and immediately after the casualty is $400. In 1961 insurance of $5,000 is received to cover the loss to the building. A has no other gains or losses in 1961 subject to section 1231 and §1.1231-1. The amount of the deduction allowable under section 165(a) with respect to the building for the taxable year 1961 is $13,000, computed as follows:
Value of property immediately before casualty, 70,000 less the value of property immediately after casualty of 52,000 equals the value of property actually destroyed, 18,000.
Loss to be taken into account for purposes of section 165(a):
Lesser amount of property actually destroyed ($18,000) or adjusted basis of property ($66,000). 18,000 less insurance received of 5,000 equals the deduction allowable of 13,000.
The amount of the deduction allowable under section 165(a) with respect to the trees and shrubs for the taxable year 1961 is $1,200, computed as follows:
Value of property immediately before casualty, 2,000 less the value of property immediately after casualty, 400 equals the value of property actually destroyed, 1,600.
Loss to be taken into account for purposes of section 165(a):
Lesser amount of property actually destroyed ($1,600) or adjusted basis of property $1,200.
Example (3). Assume the same facts as in example (2) except that A purchases land containing a house instead of an office building. The house is used as his private residence. Since the property is used for personal purposes, no allocation of the purchase price is necessary for the land and house. Likewise, no individual determination of the fair market values of the land, house, trees, and shrubs is necessary. The amount of the deduction allowable under section 165(a) with respect to the land, house, trees, and shrubs for the taxable year 1961 is $14,600, computed as follows:
Value of property immediately before casualty, 90,000 less value of property immediately after casualty, 70,400 equals value of property actually destroyed, 19,600.
Loss to be taken into account for purposes of section 165(a):
Lesser amount of property actually destroyed ($19,600) or adjusted basis of property ($91,200) less Insurance received (5,000) for a deduction allowable in the amount of 14, 600.
(4) Limitation on certain losses sustained by individuals after December 31, 1963.–(i) Pursuant to section 165(c)(3), the deduction allowable under section 165(a) in respect of a loss sustained–
(a) After December 31, 1963, in a taxable year ending after such date,
(b) In respect of property not used in a trade or business or for income producing purposes, and
(c) From a single casualty
shall be limited to that portion of the loss which is in excess of $100. The non-deductibility of the first $100 of loss applies to a loss sustained after December 31, 1963, without regard to when the casualty occurred. Thus, if property not used in a trade or business or for income producing purposes is damaged or destroyed by a casualty which occurred prior to January 1, 1964, and loss resulting there from is sustained after December 31, 1963, the $100 limitation applies.
(ii) The $100 limitation applies separately in respect of each casualty and applies to the entire loss sustained from each casualty. Thus, if as a result of a particular casualty occurring in 1964, a taxpayer sustains in 1964 a loss of $40 and in 1965 a loss of $250, no deduction is allowable for the loss sustained in 1964 and the loss sustained in 1965 must be reduced by $60 ($100-$40). The determination of whether damage to, or destruction of, property resulted from a single casualty or from two or more separate casualties will be made upon the basis of the particular facts of each case. However, events which are closely related in origin generally give rise to a single casualty. For example, if a storm damages a taxpayer's residence and his automobile parked in his driveway, any loss sustained results from a single casualty. Similarly, if a hurricane causes high waves, all wind and flood damage to a taxpayer's property caused by the hurricane and the waves results from a single casualty.
(iii) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, the $100 limitation applies separately to each individual taxpayer who sustains a loss even though the property damaged or destroyed is owned by two or more individuals. Thus, if a house occupied by two sisters and jointly owned by them is damaged or destroyed, the $100 limitation applies separately to each sister in respect of any loss sustained by her. However, for purposes of applying the $100 limitation, a husband and wife who file a joint return for the first taxable year in which the loss is allowable as a deduction are treated as one individual taxpayer. Accordingly, if property jointly owned by a husband and wife, or property separately owned by the husband or by the wife, is damaged or destroyed by a single casualty in 1964, and a loss is sustained in that year by either or both the husband or wife, only one $100 limitation applies if a joint return is filed for 1964. If, however, the husband and wife file separate returns for 1964, the $100 limitation applies separately in respect of any loss sustained by the husband and in respect of any loss sustained by the wife. Where losses from a single casualty are sustained in two or more separate tax years, the husband and wife shall, for purposes of applying the $100 limitation to such losses, be treated as one individual for all such years if they file a joint return for the first year in which a loss is sustained from the casualty; they shall be treated as separate individuals for all such years if they file separate returns for the first such year. If a joint return is filed in the first loss year but separate returns are filed in a subsequent year, any unused portion of the $100 limitation shall be allocated equally between the husband and wife in the latter year.
(iv) If a loss is sustained in respect of property used partially for business and partially for nonbusiness purposes, the $100 limitation applies only to that portion of the loss properly attributable to the nonbusiness use. For example, if a taxpayer sustains a $1,000 loss in respect of an automobile which he uses 60 percent for business and 40 percent for nonbusiness, the loss is allocated 60 percent to business use and 40 percent to nonbusiness use. The $100 limitation applies to the portion of the loss allocable to the nonbusiness loss.
(c) Loss sustained by an estate.–A casualty loss of property not connected with a trade or business and not incurred in any transaction entered into for profit which is sustained during the settlement of an estate shall be allowed as a deduction under sections 165(a) and 641(b) in computing the taxable income of the estate if the loss has not been allowed under section 2054 in computing the taxable estate of the decedent and if the statement has been filed in accordance with §1.642(g)-1. See section 165(c)(3).
(d) Loss treated as though attributable to a trade or business.–For the rule treating a casualty loss not connected with a trade or business as though it were a deduction attributable to a trade or business for purposes of computing a net operating loss, see paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of §1.172-3.
(e) Effective date.–The rules of this section are applicable to any taxable year beginning after January 16, 1960. If, for any taxable year beginning on or before such date, a taxpayer computed the amount of any casualty loss in accordance with the rules then applicable, such taxpayer is not required to change the amount of the casualty loss allowable for any such prior taxable year. On the other hand, the taxpayer may, if he so desires, amend his income tax return for such year to compute the amount of a casualty loss in accordance with the provisions of this section, but no provision in this section shall be construed as extending the period of limitations within which a claim for credit or refund may be filed under section 6511. [Reg. §1.165-7.]
.01 Historical Comment: Proposed 7/3/56 and withdrawn and reproposed 10/8/59. Adopted 1/15/60 by T.D. 6445. Amended 3/23/64 by T.D. 6712, 5/18/64 by T.D. 6735, 12/28/64 by T.D. 6786, and 12/15/77 by T.D. 7522. [ Reg. §1.165-7 does not reflect P.L. 97-248 (1982). See 9802.15 and 10,005.041.]
FINAL-REG, 2003FED 9803, §1.165-1, Losses.–
Losses.–(a) Allowance of deduction.–Section 165(a) provides that, in computing taxable income under section 63, any loss actually sustained during the taxable year and not made good by insurance or some other form of compensation shall be allowed as a deduction subject to any provision of the internal revenue laws which prohibits or limits the amount of the deduction. This deduction for losses sustained shall be taken in accordance with section 165 and the regulations there under. For the disallowance of deductions for worthless securities issued by a political party, see §1.271-1.
(b) Nature of loss allowable.–To be allowable as a deduction under section 165(a), a loss must be evidenced by closed and completed transactions, fixed by identifiable events, and, except as otherwise provided in section 165(h) and §1.165-11, relating to disaster losses, actually sustained during the taxable year. Only a bona fide loss is allowable. Substance and not mere form shall govern in determining a deductible loss.
(c) Amount deductible.–(1) The amount of loss allowable as a deduction under section 165(a) shall not exceed the amount prescribed by §1.1011-1 as the adjusted basis for determining the loss from the sale or other disposition of the property involved. In the case of each such deduction claimed, therefore, the basis of the property must be properly adjusted as prescribed by §1.1011-1 for such items as expenditures, receipts, or losses, properly chargeable to capital account, and for such items as depreciation, obsolescence, amortization, and depletion, in order to determine the amount of loss allowable as a deduction. To determine the allowable loss in the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, see also paragraph (b) of §1.1053-1.
(2) The amount of loss recognized upon the sale or exchange of property shall be determined for purposes of section 165(a) in accordance with §1.1002-1.
(3) A loss from the sale or exchange of a capital asset shall be allowed as a deduction under section 165(a) but only to the extent allowed in section 1211 (relating to limitation on capital losses) and section 1212 (relating to capital loss carrybacks and carryovers), and in the regulations under those sections.
(4) In determining the amount of loss actually sustained for purposes of section 165(a), proper adjustment shall be made for any salvage value and for any insurance or other compensation received.
(d) Year of deduction.–(1) A loss shall be allowed as a deduction under section 165(a) only for the taxable year in which the loss is sustained. For this purpose, a loss shall be treated as sustained during the taxable year in which the loss occurs as evidenced by closed and completed transactions and as fixed by identifiable events occurring in such taxable year. For provisions relating to situations where a loss attributable to a disaster will be treated as sustained in the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the disaster actually occurred, see section 165(h) and §1.165-11.
(2) (i) If a casualty or other event occurs which may result in a loss and, in the year of such casualty or event, there exists a claim for reimbursement with respect to which there is a reasonable prospect of recovery, no portion of the loss with respect to which reimbursement may be received is sustained, for purposes of section 165, until it can be ascertained with reasonable certainty whether or not such reimbursement will be received. Whether a reasonable prospect of recovery exists with respect to a claim for reimbursement of a loss is a question of fact to be determined upon an examination of all facts and circumstances. Whether or not such reimbursement will be received may be ascertained with reasonable certainty, for example, by a settlement of the claim, by an adjudication of the claim, or by an abandonment of the claim. When a taxpayer claims that the taxable year in which a loss is sustained is fixed by his abandonment of the claim for reimbursement, he must be able to produce objective evidence of his having abandoned the claim, such as the execution of a release.
(ii) If in the year of the casualty or other event a portion of the loss is not covered by a claim for reimbursement with respect to which there is a reasonable prospect of recovery, then such portion of the loss is sustained during the taxable year in which the casualty or other event occurs. For example, if property having an adjusted basis of $10,000 is completely destroyed by fire in 1961, and if the taxpayer's only claim for reimbursement consists of an insurance claim for $8,000 which is settled in 1962, the taxpayer sustains a loss of $2,000 in 1961. However, if the taxpayer's automobile is completely destroyed in 1961 as a result of the negligence of another person and there exists a reasonable prospect of recovery on a claim for the full value of the automobile against such person, the taxpayer does not sustain any loss until the taxable year in which the claim is adjudicated or otherwise settled. If the automobile had an adjusted basis of $5,000 and the taxpayer secures a judgment of $4,000 in 1962, $1,000 is deductible for the taxable year 1962. If in 1963 it becomes reasonably certain that only $3,500 can ever be collected on such judgment, $500 is deductible for the taxable year 1963.
(iii) If the taxpayer deducted a loss in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph and in a subsequent taxable year receives reimbursement for such loss, he does not recompute the tax for the taxable year in which the deduction was taken but includes the amount of such reimbursement in his gross income for the taxable year in which received, subject to the provisions of section 111, relating to recovery of amounts previously deducted.
(3) Any loss arising from theft shall be treated as sustained during the taxable year in which the taxpayer discovers the loss (see §1.165-8, relating to theft losses). However, if in the year of discovery there exists a claim for reimbursement with respect to which there is a reasonable prospect of recovery, no portion of the loss with respect to which reimbursement may be received is sustained, for purposes of section 165, until the taxable year in which it can be ascertained with reasonable certainty whether or not such reimbursement will be received.
(4) The rules of this paragraph are applicable with respect to a casualty or other event which may result in a loss and which occurs after January 16, 1960. If the casualty or other event occurs on or before such date, a taxpayer may treat any loss resulting there from in accordance with the rules then applicable, or, if he so desires, in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph; but no provision of this paragraph shall be construed to permit a deduction of the same loss or any part thereof in more than one taxable year or to extend the period of limitations within which a claim for credit or refund may be filed under section 6511.
(e) Limitation on losses of individuals.–In the case of an individual, the deduction for losses granted by section 165(a) shall, subject to the provisions of section 165(c) and paragraph (a) of this section, be limited to:
(1) Losses incurred in a trade or business;
(2) Losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or business; and
(3) Losses of property not connected with a trade or business and not incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, if such losses arise from fire, storm, shipwreck, or other casualty, or from theft, and if the loss involved has not been allowed for estate tax purposes in the estate tax return. For additional provisions pertaining to the allowance of casualty and theft losses, see §§1.165-7 and 1.165-8, respectively. For special rules relating to an election by a taxpayer to deduct disaster losses in the taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year in which the disaster occurred, see section 165(h) and §1.165-11. [Reg. §1.165-1.]
.01 Historical Comment: Proposed 7/3/56 and withdrawn and reproposed 10/8/59. Adopted 1/15/60 by T.D. 6445. Amended 5/18/64 by T.D. 6735, 1/17/69 by T.D. 6996, 1/3/74 by T.D. 7301, and 12/15/77 by T.D. 7522.
Section 611 Regulations
Regulations Section 611 – 1
FINAL-REG, 2003FED 23,922, §1.611-1., Allowance of deduction for depletion.–
Allowance of deduction for depletion.
(a) Depletion of mines, oil and gas wells, other natural deposits, and timber. – (1) In general.–Section 611 provides that there shall be allowed as a deduction in computing taxable income in the case of mines, oil and gas wells, other natural deposits, and timber, a reasonable allowance for depletion. In the case of standing timber, the depletion allowance shall be computed solely upon the adjusted basis of the property. In the case of other exhaustible natural resources the allowance for depletion shall be computed upon either the adjusted depletion basis of the property (see section 612, relating to cost depletion) or upon a percentage of gross income from the property (see section 613, relating to percentage depletion), whichever results in the greater allowance for depletion for any taxable year. In no case will depletion based upon discovery value be allowed.(2) See §1.611-5 for methods of depreciation relating to improvements connected with mineral or timber properties.
(3) See paragraph (d) of this section for definition of terms.
(b) Economic interest. – (1) Annual depletion deductions are allowed only to the owner of an economic interest in mineral deposits or standing timber. An economic interest is possessed in every case in which the taxpayer has acquired by investment any interest in mineral in place or standing timber and secures, by any form of legal relationship, income derived from the extraction of the mineral or severance of the timber, to which he must look for a return of his capital. For an exception in the case of certain mineral production payments, see section 636 and the regulations there under. A person who has no capital investment in the mineral deposit or standing timber does not possess an economic interest merely because through a contractual relation he possesses a mere economic or pecuniary advantage derived from production. For example, an agreement between the owner of an economic interest and another entitling the latter to purchase or process the product upon production or entitling the latter to compensation for extraction or cutting does not convey a depletable economic interest. Further, depletion deductions with respect to an economic interest of a corporation are allowed to the corporation and not to its shareholders.
(2) No depletion deduction shall be allowed the owner with respect to any timber, coal, or domestic iron ore that such owner has disposed of under any form of contract by virtue of which he retains an economic interest in such timber, coal, or iron ore, if such disposal is considered a sale of timber, coal, or domestic iron ore under section 631(b) or (c).
(c) Special rules.–(1) In general. – For the purpose of the equitable apportionment of depletion among the several owners of economic interests in a mineral deposit or standing timber, if the value of any mineral or timber must be ascertained as of any specific date for the determination of the basis for depletion, the values of such several interests therein may be determined separately, but, when determined as of the same date, shall together never exceed the value at that date of the mineral or timber as a whole.
(2) Leases.–In the case of a lease, the deduction for depletion under section 611 shall be equitably apportioned between the lessor and lessee. In the case of a lease or other contract providing for the sharing of economic interest in a mineral deposit or standing timber, such deduction shall be computed by each taxpayer by reference to the adjusted basis of his property determined in accordance with sections 611 and 612, or computed in accordance with section 613, if applicable, and the regulations there under.
(3) Life tenant and remainderman. – In the case of property held by one person for life with remainder to another person, the deduction for depletion under section 611 shall be computed as if the life tenant were the absolute owner of the property so that he will be entitled to the deduction during his life, and thereafter the deduction, if any, shall be allowed to the remainderman.
(4) Mineral or timber property held in trust. – If a mineral property or timber property is held in trust, the allowable deduction for depletion is to be apportioned between the income beneficiaries and the trustee on the basis of the trust income from such property allocable to each, unless the governing instrument (or local law) requires or permits the trustee to maintain a reserve for depletion in any amount. In the latter case, the deduction is first allocated to the trustee to the extent that income is set aside for a depletion reserve, and any part of the deduction in excess of the income set aside for the reserve shall be apportioned between the income beneficiaries and the trustee on the basis of the trust income (in excess of the income set aside for the reserve) allocable to each. For example:
(i) If under the trust instrument or local law the income of a trust computed without regard to depletion is to be distributed to a named beneficiary, the beneficiary is entitled to the deduction to the exclusion of the trustee.
(ii) If under the trust instrument or local law the income of a trust is to be distributed to a named beneficiary, but the trustee is directed to maintain a reserve for depletion in any amount, the deduction is allowed to the trustee (except to the extent that income set aside for the reserve is less than the allowable deduction). The same result would follow if the trustee sets aside income for a depletion reserve pursuant to discretionary authority to do so in the governing instrument.
No effect shall be given to any allocation of the depletion deduction which gives any beneficiary or the trustee a share of such deduction greater than his pro rata share of the trust income, irrespective of any provisions in the trust instrument, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph when the trust instrument or local law requires or permits the trustee to maintain a reserve for depletion.
(5) Mineral or timber property held by estate. – In the case of mineral property or timber property held by an estate, the deduction for depletion under section 611 shall be apportioned between the estate and the heirs, legatees, and devisees on the basis of income of the estate from such property which is allocable to each.
(d) Definitions. – As used in this part, and the regulations there under, the term–
(1) "Property" means – (i) in the case of minerals, each separate economic interest owned in each mineral deposit in each separate tract or parcel of land or an aggregation or combination of such mineral interests permitted under section 614(b), (c), (d), or (e); and (ii) in the case of timber, an economic interest in standing timber in each tract or block representing a separate timber account (see paragraph (d) of §1.611-3). For rules with respect to waste or residue of prior mining, see paragraph (c) of §1.614-1. When, in the regulations under this part, either the word "mineral" or "timber" precedes the word "property", such adjectives are used only to classify the type of "property" involved. For further explanation of the term "property", see section 614 and the regulations there under.
(2) "Fair market value" of a property is that amount which would induce a willing seller to sell and a willing buyer to purchase.
(3) "Mineral enterprise" is the mineral deposit or deposits and improvements, if any, used in mining or in the production of oil and gas and only so much of the surface of the land as is necessary for purposes of mineral extraction. The value of the mineral enterprise is the combined value of its component parts.
(4) "Mineral deposit" refers to minerals in place. When a mineral enterprise is acquired as a unit, the cost of any interest in the mineral deposit or deposits is that proportion of the total cost of the mineral enterprise which the value of the interest in the deposit bears to the value of the entire enterprise at the time of its acquisition.
(5) "Minerals" includes ores of the metals, coal, oil, gas, and all other natural metallic and nonmetallic deposits, except minerals derived from sea water, the air, or from similar inexhaustible sources. It includes but is not limited to all of the minerals and other natural deposits subject to depletion based upon a percentage of gross income from the property under section 613 and the regulations there under. [Reg. §1.611-1.]
.01 Historical Comment: Proposed 11/3/56. Adopted 1/20/60 by T.D. 6446. Amended 7/26/65 by T.D. 6841 and 2/26/73 by T.D. 7261.
Regulations Section 611 – 3
FINAL-REG, 2003FED 23,928, §1.611-3., Rules applicable to timber.–
Rules applicable to timber. – (a) Capital recoverable through depletion allowance in case of timber.–In general, the capital remaining in any year recoverable through depletion allowances is the basis provided by section 612 and the regulations there under. For the method of determining fair market value and quantity of timber, see paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section. For capitalization of carrying charges, see section 1016(a)(1)(A). Amounts paid or incurred in connection with the planting of timber (including planting for Christmas tree purposes) shall be capitalized and recoverable through depletion allowances. Such amounts include, for example, expenditures made for the preparation of the timber site for planting or for natural seeding and the cost of seedlings. The apportionment of deductions between the several owners of economic interests in standing timber will be made as provided in paragraph (c) of §1.611-1.
(b) Computation of allowance for depletion of timber for taxable year.–(1) The depletion of timber takes place at the time timber is cut, but the amount of depletion allowable with respect to timber that has been cut may be computed when the quantity of cut timber is first accurately measured in the process of exploitation. To the extent that depletion is allowable in a particular taxable year with respect to timber the products of which are not sold during such year, the depletion so allowable shall be included as an item of cost in the closing inventory of such products for such year.
(2) The depletion unit of the timber for a given timber account in a given year shall be the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the basis provided by section 1012 and adjusted as provided by section 1016, of the timber on hand at the beginning of the year plus the cost of the number of units of timber acquired during the year plus proper additions to capital, by (ii) the total number of units of timber on hand in the given account at the beginning of the year plus the number of units acquired during the year plus (or minus) the number of units required to be added (or deducted) by way of correcting the estimate of the number of units remaining available in the account. The number of units of timber of a given timber account cut during any taxable year multiplied by the depletion unit of that timber account applicable to such year shall be the amount of depletion allowable for the taxable year. Those taxpayers who keep their accounts on a monthly basis may, at their option, keep their depletion accounts on such basis, in which case the amount allowable on account of depletion for a given month will be determined in the manner outlined herein for a given year. The total amount of the allowance for depletion in any taxable year shall be the sum of the amounts allowable for the several timber accounts. For a description of timber accounts, see paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
(3) When a taxpayer has elected to treat the cutting of timber as a sale or exchange of such timber under the provisions of section 631(a), he shall reduce the timber account containing such timber by an amount equal to the adjusted depletion basis of such timber. In computing any further gain or loss on such timber, see paragraph (e) of §1.631-1.
(c) Timber depletion accounts on books.–(1) Every taxpayer claiming or expecting to claim a deduction for depletion of timber property shall keep accurate ledger accounts in which shall be recorded the cost or other basis provided by section 1012 of the property and land together with subsequent allowable capital additions in each account and all other adjustments provided by section 1016 and the regulations there under.
(2) In such accounts there shall be set up separately the quantity of timber, the quantity of land, and the quantity of other resources, if any, and a proper part of the total cost or value shall be allocated to each after proper provision for immature timber growth. See paragraph (d) of this section. The timber accounts shall be credited each year with the amount of the charges to the depletion accounts computed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section or the amount of the charges to the depletion accounts shall be credited to depletion reserve accounts. When the sum of the credits for depletion equals the cost or other basis of the timber property, plus subsequent allowable capital additions, no further deduction for depletion will be allowed.
(d) Aggregating timber and land for purposes of valuation and accounting.–(1) With a view to logical and reasonable valuation of timber, the taxpayer shall include his timber in one or more accounts. In general, each such account shall include all of the taxpayer's timber which is located in one "block". A block may be an operation unit which includes all the taxpayer's timber which would logically go to a single given point of manufacture. In those cases in which the point of manufacture is at a considerable distance, or in which the logs or other products will probably be sold in a log or other market, the block may be a logging unit which includes all of the taxpayer's timber which would logically be removed by a single logging development. Blocks may also be established by geographical or political boundaries or by logical management areas. Timber acquired under cutting contracts should be carried in separate accounts and shall not constitute part of any block. In exceptional cases, provided there are good and substantial reasons, and subject to approval or revision by the district director on audit, the taxpayer may divide the timber in a given block into two or more accounts. For example, timber owned on February 28, 1913, and that purchased subsequently may be kept in separate accounts, or timber owned on February 28, 1913, and the timber purchased since that date in several distinct transactions may be kept in several distinct accounts. Individual tree species or groups of tree species may be carried in distinct accounts, or special timber products may be carried in distinct accounts. Blocks may be divided into two or more accounts based on the character of the timber or its accessibility, or scattered tracts may be included in separate accounts. If such a division is made, a proper portion of the total value or cost, as the case may be, shall be allocated to each account.
(2) The timber accounts mentioned in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph shall not include any part of the value or cost, as the case may be, of the land. In a manner similar to that prescribed in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, the land in a given "block" may be carried in a single land account or may be divided into two or more accounts on the basis of its character or accessibility. When such a division is made, a proper portion of the total value or cost, as the case may be, shall be allocated to each account.
(3) The total value or total cost, as the case may be, of land and timber shall be equitably allocated to the timber and land accounts, respectively. In cases in which immature timber growth is a factor, a reasonable portion of the total value or cost shall be allocated to such immature timber, and when the timber becomes merchantable such value or cost shall be recoverable through depletion allowances.
(4) Each of the several land and timber accounts carried on the books of the taxpayer shall be definitely described as to their location on the ground either by maps or by legal descriptions.
(5) For good and substantial reasons satisfactory to the district director, or as required by the district director on audit, the timber or the land accounts may be readjusted by dividing individual accounts, by combining two or more accounts, or by dividing and recombining accounts.
(e) Determination of quantity of timber.–Each taxpayer claiming or expecting to claim a deduction for depletion is required to estimate with respect to each separate timber account the total units (feet board measure, log scale, cords, or other units) of timber reasonably known, or on good evidence believed, to have existed on the ground on March 1, 1913, or on the date of acquisition of the property, whichever date is applicable in determining the basis for cost depletion. This estimate shall state as nearly as possible the number of units which would have been found present by careful estimate made on the specified date with the object of determining 100 percent of the quantity of timber which the area covered by the specific account would have produced on that date if all of the merchantable timber had been cut and utilized in accordance with the standards of utilization prevailing in that region at that time. If subsequently during the ownership of the taxpayer making the return, as the result of the growth of the timber, of changes in standards of utilization, of losses not otherwise accounted for, of abandonment of timber, or of operations or development work, it is ascertained either by the taxpayer or the district director that there remain on the ground, available for utilization, more or less units of timber at the close of the taxable year (or at the close of the month if the taxpayer keeps his depletion accounts on a monthly basis) than remain in the timber account or accounts on the basis of the original estimate, then the original estimate (but not the basis for depletion) shall be revised. The depletion unit shall be changed when such revision has been made. The annual charge to the depletion account with respect to the property shall be computed by using such revised unit for the taxable year for which the revision is made and all subsequent taxable years until a change in facts require another revision.
(f) Determination of fair market value of timber property.–(1) If the fair market value of the property at a specified date is the basis for depletion deductions, such value shall be determined, subject to approval or revision by the district director upon audit, by the owner of the property in the light of the most reliable and accurate information available with reference to the condition of the property as it existed at that date, regardless of all subsequent changes, such as changes in surrounding circumstances, and methods of exploitation, in degree of utilization, etc. Such factors as the following will be given due consideration–
(i) Character and quality of the timber as determined by species, age, size, condition, etc.;
(ii) The quantity of timber per acre, the total quantity under consideration, and the location of the timber in question with reference to other timber;
(iii) Accessibility of the timber (location with reference to distance from a common carrier, the topography and other features of the ground upon which the timber stands and over which it must be transported in process of exploitation, the probable cost of exploitation and the climate and the state of industrial development of the locality); and
(iv) The freight rates by common carrier to important markets.
(2) The timber in each particular case will be valued on its own merits and not on the basis of general averages for regions; however, the value placed upon it, taking into consideration such factors as those mentioned in this paragraph, will be consistent with that of other similar timber in the region. The district director will give weight and consideration to any and all facts and evidence having a bearing on the market value, such as cost, actual sales and transfers of similar properties, the margin between the cost of production and the price realized for timber products, market value of stock or shares, royalties and rentals, valuation for local or State taxation, partnership accountings, records of litigation in which the value of the property has been involved, the amount at which the property may have been inventoried or appraised in probate or similar proceedings, disinterested appraisals by approved methods, and other factors.
(g) Revaluation of timber property not allowed.–No revaluation of a timber property whose value as of any specific date has been determined and approved will be made or allowed during the continuance of the ownership under which the value was so determined and approved, except in the case of misrepresentation or fraud or gross error as to any facts known on the date as of which the valuation was made. Revaluation on account of misrepresentation or fraud or such gross error will be made only with the written approval of the Commissioner. The depletion unit shall be revised when such a revaluation of a timber property has been made and the annual charge to the depletion account with respect to the property shall be computed by using such revised unit for the taxable year for which such revision is made and for all subsequent taxable years.
(h) Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.–(1) Taxable years beginning before January 1, 2002.–A taxpayer claiming a deduction for depletion of timber for a taxable year beginning before January 1, 2002, shall attach to the income tax return of the taxpayer a filled-out Form T (Timber) for the taxable year covered by the income tax return, including the following information–
(i) A map where necessary to show clearly timber and land acquired, timber cut, and timber and land sold;
(ii) Description of, cost of, and terms of purchase of timberland or timber, or cutting rights, including timber or timber rights acquired under any type of contract;
(iii) Profit or loss from sale of land, or timber, or both;
(iv) Description of timber with respect to which claim for loss, if any, is made;
(v) Record of timber cut;
(vi) Changes in each timber account as a result of purchase, sale, cutting, estimates, or loss;
(vii) Changes in improvements accounts as the result of additions to or deductions from capital and depreciation, and computation of profit or loss on sale or other disposition of such improvements;
(viii) Operation data with respect to raw and finished material handled and inventoried;
(ix) Statement as to application of the election under section 631(a) and pertinent information in support of the fair market value claimed there under;
(x) Information with respect to land ownership and capital investment in timberland; and
(xi) Any other data which will be helpful in determining the reasonableness of the depletion or depreciation deductions claimed in the return.
(2) Taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001.–A taxpayer claiming a deduction for depletion of timber on a return filed for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2001, shall attach to the income tax return of the taxpayer a filled-out Form T (Timber) for the taxable year covered by the income tax return. In addition, the taxpayer must retain records sufficient to substantiate the right of the taxpayer to claim the deduction, including a map, where necessary, to show clearly timber and land acquired, timber cut, and timber and land sold for as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. [Reg. §1.611-3.]
.01 Historical Comment: Proposed 11/3/56. Adopted 1/20/60 by T.D. 6446. Amended 4/23/2002 by T.D. 8989 and 1/30/2003 by T.D. 9040.
Notice 2006-47:
Act Sec. 322 -- Expensing of Certain Reforestation Expenditures
Act section 322 allows taxpayers to elect, under section 194(b) of the Code, to treat up to $10,000 of reforestation expenditures with respect to any qualified timber property as an expense that is not chargeable to capital account and to deduct those expenditures in the year paid or incurred under section 194(b). The remainder of the reforestation expenditures for the year may be amortized over 84 months under section 194(a).
Taxpayers making an election for a qualified timber property under sections 194(a) or 194(b) should create and maintain separate timber accounts for each qualified timber property and should include all reforestation treatments and the dates upon which each was applied. Any qualified timber property that is subject to a section 194 election may not be included in any other timber account (e.g., depletion block) for which depletion is allowed under section 611. At no time may an amortizable timber account become part of a depletable timber account for purposes of deduction under section 165(a). The timber account should be maintained until the timber is disposed of through sale, harvest or other transaction. All records relating to a qualified timber property account also should be maintained until disposal occurs.
Effective Date: Reforestation expenditures with respect to a qualified timber property paid or incurred after October 22, 2004.
Deadline for Making Election: The election must be made on a timely filed return (including extensions) for the taxable year in which the reforestation expenditures with respect to a qualified timber property were paid or incurred.
If, before June 15, 2006, a taxpayer filed its federal tax return for a taxable year ending after October 22, 2004, in which reforestation expenditures were paid or incurred after October 22, 2004, with respect to any qualified timber property, and if the taxpayer wants to make a section 194(b) election for the reforestation expenditures paid or incurred during that taxable year, the taxpayer may make the election either:
(1) Filing an amended federal tax return for the taxable year in which the taxpayer paid or incurred the reforestation expenditures for which the taxpayer wants to make the election, and all subsequent affected taxable year(s), on or before November 15, 2006; or
(2) Filing a Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, for the first or second taxable year ending on or after December 31, 2005, in accordance with the automatic change in method of accounting provisions of Revenue Procedure 2002-9, 2002-1 Cumulative Bulletin 327, as modified and clarified by Announcement 2002-17, 2002-1 C.B. 561, modified and amplified by Revenue Procedure 2002-19, 2002-1 C.B. 696, and amplified, clarified, and modified by Revenue Procedure 2002-54, 2002-2 C.B. 432, or any successor. The change in method of accounting from filing a Form 3115 results in a section 481(a) adjustment. Further, the scope limitations in section 4.02 of Revenue Procedure 2002-9 do not apply. Moreover, for purposes of section 6.02(4) (a) of Revenue Procedure 2002-9, the taxpayer should incl0ude on line 1a of the Form 3115 the designated automatic accounting method change number “101.”
Section 1.446-1(e)(3)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations authorizes the Commissioner to prescribe administrative procedures setting forth the limitations, terms, and conditions deemed necessary to permit a taxpayer to obtain consent to change a method of accounting. In addition, section 2.04 of Revenue Procedure 2002-9 provides that unless specifically authorized by the Commissioner, a taxpayer may not request, or otherwise make, a retroactive change in method of accounting, regardless of whether the change is from a permissible or an impermissible method. See generally Revenue Ruling 90-38, 1990-1 C.B. 57.
In accordance with section1.446-1(3)(3(ii), Revenue Ruling 90-38, and section 2.04 of Revenue Procedure 2002-9, a taxpayer making a section 194(b) election for a prior taxable year by filing amended federal tax return(s) in accordance with this notice is hereby granted consent to make this retroactive change in method of accounting using a cut-off method.
If a taxpayer already made a section 194(b) election on a federal income tax return that was filed before June 15, 2006, but did not include with that return all of the information specified below under Interim Rules, the taxpayer should complete Part IV of the December 2005 or later revision of Form T, if Form T is otherwise required to be filed, or prepare a statement containing the information specified below under Interim Rules, and attach it to the taxpayer's next filed federal income tax return.
Interim Rules: The election may be made by entering the deduction claimed on the appropriate line of a taxpayer's income tax return for the year in which the reforestation expenditures were paid or incurred, and either completing Part IV of the December 2005 or later revision of Form T, if Form T is otherwise required to be filed, or attaching a statement to the return that includes the following information for each qualified timber property for which an election is being made: the unique stand identification numbers, the total number of acres reforested during the taxable year, the nature of the reforestation treatments, and the total amounts of the qualified reforestation expenditures eligible to be amortized under section 194(a) or deducted under section 194(b). If, in accordance with this notice, a taxpayer is making a section 194(b) election for a prior taxable year by filing amended federal tax return(s), this statement should be attached to the amended federal tax return(s). If, in accordance with this notice, a taxpayer is making a section 194(b) election for a prior taxable year by filing a Form 3115 for the first or second taxable year ending on or after December 31, 2005, the statement should be attached to the Form 3115.
An election under section 194 may be revoked only with the consent of the Commissioner, which will only be granted in rare and unusual circumstances. An application for consent to revoke an election under section 194 should be submitted to the Internal Revenue Service in the form of a letter ruling request. The application should contain all of the information necessary to demonstrate the rare and unusual circumstances that would justify granting the revocation including: the name and address of the taxpayer, the taxable years for which the election was in effect, and the reason for revoking the election.
